Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
111
 questions about 
Biology
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
1281
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
51
 questions about 
War

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.