Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Perception
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.