Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
27
 questions about 
Gender
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.