Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.