Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.