Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
134
 questions about 
Love
77
 questions about 
Emotion
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.