Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Action
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.