Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

Intentionally false speech isn't completely free. Lying under oath is against the law. So are slander and libel. So is providing false information on your tax forms. And so on. It would be odd to think these laws should be abandoned.

But not all deliberately false speech is illegal. If you tell me that my ridiculous new hat is just dandy because you don't want to hurt my feelings, it's legal and should be. Less happily, politicians can lie when they make campaign promises or stand up in the Senate and say that there's no such thing as global warming even when they know damn well that it's real.

Of course being legal isn't the same as being cost-free. If you come to be known as a liar, you're likely to pay a social price, and that seems more or less right. Politicians may also pay if they can't persuade voters to believe them or if they get caught in a lie. The justice is rough, but it's not nonexistent.

It's hard to say anything precise here. Wrongdoing shouldn't be cost-free, and deliberate lying is usually wrong. (Kant seemed to have thought that it's always wrong, but most of us would say that it's fine to lie to the Nazi at the door.) There's a point to reminding ourselves that we shouldn't become indifferent to bad acts, though we also shouldn't let ourselves become zealots. But these days is seems that truth is fighting a losing battle; the lies have been costly and they're getting costlier. This makes your question a timely one; a reason to remember that there's an election coming up.