Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
134
 questions about 
Love
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.