Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
117
 questions about 
Children
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.