Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
392
 questions about 
Religion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
284
 questions about 
Mind
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.