Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.