Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.