Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
81
 questions about 
Identity
32
 questions about 
Sport
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.