Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.