Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.