Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
218
 questions about 
Education
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.