Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
117
 questions about 
Children
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.