Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
24
 questions about 
Suicide
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.