Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.