Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.