Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
392
 questions about 
Religion
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.