Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.