Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.