Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
151
 questions about 
Existence
36
 questions about 
Literature
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.