Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
287
 questions about 
Language
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.