Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
77
 questions about 
Emotion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
27
 questions about 
Gender
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.