Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
23
 questions about 
History
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.