Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.