Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
23
 questions about 
History
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
67
 questions about 
Feminism
124
 questions about 
Profession
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.