Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Biology
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
134
 questions about 
Love
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.