Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Abortion
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.