Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
80
 questions about 
Death
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Biology
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.