Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
51
 questions about 
War
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.