Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
67
 questions about 
Feminism
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.