Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Perception
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
68
 questions about 
Happiness
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Beauty
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.