Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
51
 questions about 
War
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
105
 questions about 
Art
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.