Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
170
 questions about 
Freedom
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
89
 questions about 
Law
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.