Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
96
 questions about 
Time
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.