Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
4
 questions about 
Economics
27
 questions about 
Gender
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
244
 questions about 
Justice
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.