Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
374
 questions about 
Logic
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
117
 questions about 
Children
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.