Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.