Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.