Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
89
 questions about 
Law
284
 questions about 
Mind
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
154
 questions about 
Sex
77
 questions about 
Emotion
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Animals
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.