Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
51
 questions about 
War
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.