Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.