Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
287
 questions about 
Language
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Punishment
32
 questions about 
Sport
31
 questions about 
Space
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.