Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Culture
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
77
 questions about 
Emotion
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.