Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Biology
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.