Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Biology
4
 questions about 
Economics
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
117
 questions about 
Children

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.