Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
208
 questions about 
Science
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.