Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
39
 questions about 
Race
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
244
 questions about 
Justice
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.