Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature
43
 questions about 
Color
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.