Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Punishment
2
 questions about 
Action
392
 questions about 
Religion
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.