Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Animals
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Action

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.