Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
27
 questions about 
Gender
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.