Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
208
 questions about 
Science
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
34
 questions about 
Music
110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.