Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.