Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

124
 questions about 
Profession
67
 questions about 
Feminism
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
77
 questions about 
Emotion
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
88
 questions about 
Physics
134
 questions about 
Love

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.