Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
80
 questions about 
Death
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
77
 questions about 
Emotion
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
96
 questions about 
Time
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
88
 questions about 
Physics
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.