Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
96
 questions about 
Time
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Biology
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
244
 questions about 
Justice
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
43
 questions about 
Color
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.