Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.