Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
89
 questions about 
Law
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
4
 questions about 
Economics
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
31
 questions about 
Space
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.