Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
284
 questions about 
Mind
51
 questions about 
War
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
134
 questions about 
Love
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.