Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
23
 questions about 
History
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
374
 questions about 
Logic
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.