Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.