Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
89
 questions about 
Law
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
88
 questions about 
Physics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice
34
 questions about 
Music
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Culture
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
43
 questions about 
Color

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.