Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Animals
96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
77
 questions about 
Emotion

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.