Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
134
 questions about 
Love
34
 questions about 
Music
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
284
 questions about 
Mind
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.