Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
244
 questions about 
Justice
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
81
 questions about 
Identity
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
39
 questions about 
Race
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
67
 questions about 
Feminism
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.