Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
36
 questions about 
Literature
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
117
 questions about 
Children
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Perception
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Punishment
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
4
 questions about 
Economics
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.