Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
221
 questions about 
Value
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Punishment
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
134
 questions about 
Love
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Perception
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business
36
 questions about 
Literature
39
 questions about 
Race
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.