Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Punishment
34
 questions about 
Music
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Action
392
 questions about 
Religion
75
 questions about 
Perception
287
 questions about 
Language
221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
151
 questions about 
Existence
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.