Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
32
 questions about 
Sport
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
117
 questions about 
Children
39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.