Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

51
 questions about 
War
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
39
 questions about 
Race
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
218
 questions about 
Education
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Action
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.