Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
374
 questions about 
Logic
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Culture
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
4
 questions about 
Economics
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.