Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
32
 questions about 
Sport
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
117
 questions about 
Children
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
70
 questions about 
Truth
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
89
 questions about 
Law
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
110
 questions about 
Animals
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
51
 questions about 
War
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Beauty
244
 questions about 
Justice

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.