Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
67
 questions about 
Feminism
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Abortion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
392
 questions about 
Religion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
4
 questions about 
Economics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
218
 questions about 
Education
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.