Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
27
 questions about 
Gender
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
69
 questions about 
Business
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
154
 questions about 
Sex
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
81
 questions about 
Identity
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.