Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

287
 questions about 
Language
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Action
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
284
 questions about 
Mind
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
88
 questions about 
Physics
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
244
 questions about 
Justice
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.