Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
244
 questions about 
Justice
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
284
 questions about 
Mind
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
27
 questions about 
Gender
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
81
 questions about 
Identity
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Biology
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Perception
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
170
 questions about 
Freedom
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.