Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
218
 questions about 
Education
36
 questions about 
Literature
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
4
 questions about 
Economics
89
 questions about 
Law
43
 questions about 
Color
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
34
 questions about 
Music
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
54
 questions about 
Medicine
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
51
 questions about 
War
244
 questions about 
Justice
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Perception
58
 questions about 
Abortion
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Beauty
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.