Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
36
 questions about 
Literature
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
24
 questions about 
Suicide
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
51
 questions about 
War
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
75
 questions about 
Beauty
374
 questions about 
Logic
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
170
 questions about 
Freedom
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.