Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
51
 questions about 
War
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
23
 questions about 
History
4
 questions about 
Economics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
31
 questions about 
Space
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
69
 questions about 
Business
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.