Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology
69
 questions about 
Business
117
 questions about 
Children
67
 questions about 
Feminism
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
124
 questions about 
Profession
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
218
 questions about 
Education
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
105
 questions about 
Art
51
 questions about 
War
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Punishment
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
39
 questions about 
Race
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.