Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
221
 questions about 
Value
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
36
 questions about 
Literature
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
23
 questions about 
History
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
2
 questions about 
Action
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
154
 questions about 
Sex
208
 questions about 
Science
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
170
 questions about 
Freedom
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.