Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

134
 questions about 
Love
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
221
 questions about 
Value
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
154
 questions about 
Sex
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
282
 questions about 
Knowledge

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.