Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Action
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
208
 questions about 
Science
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
54
 questions about 
Medicine
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.