Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
43
 questions about 
Color
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
96
 questions about 
Time
81
 questions about 
Identity
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
69
 questions about 
Business
221
 questions about 
Value
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
151
 questions about 
Existence

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.