Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

70
 questions about 
Truth
54
 questions about 
Medicine
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
117
 questions about 
Children
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Beauty
31
 questions about 
Space
77
 questions about 
Emotion
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
80
 questions about 
Death
69
 questions about 
Business
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
124
 questions about 
Profession
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Abortion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
154
 questions about 
Sex
24
 questions about 
Suicide
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Action
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
58
 questions about 
Punishment
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
170
 questions about 
Freedom
68
 questions about 
Happiness
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.