Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
170
 questions about 
Freedom
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
221
 questions about 
Value
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Animals
75
 questions about 
Beauty
75
 questions about 
Perception
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
96
 questions about 
Time
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
154
 questions about 
Sex
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
27
 questions about 
Gender
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
374
 questions about 
Logic
392
 questions about 
Religion
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
81
 questions about 
Identity

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.