Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
284
 questions about 
Mind
23
 questions about 
History
31
 questions about 
Space
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
43
 questions about 
Color
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
54
 questions about 
Medicine
110
 questions about 
Animals
154
 questions about 
Sex
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
32
 questions about 
Sport
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.