Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
89
 questions about 
Law
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
124
 questions about 
Profession
75
 questions about 
Perception
151
 questions about 
Existence
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business
392
 questions about 
Religion
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
70
 questions about 
Truth
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.