Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
284
 questions about 
Mind
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
287
 questions about 
Language
23
 questions about 
History
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
374
 questions about 
Logic
151
 questions about 
Existence
75
 questions about 
Perception
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
392
 questions about 
Religion
43
 questions about 
Color
105
 questions about 
Art
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
154
 questions about 
Sex
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.