Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

4
 questions about 
Economics
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
88
 questions about 
Physics
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
51
 questions about 
War
67
 questions about 
Feminism
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Biology
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
81
 questions about 
Identity
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
77
 questions about 
Emotion
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.