Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

208
 questions about 
Science
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Action
67
 questions about 
Feminism
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
284
 questions about 
Mind
244
 questions about 
Justice
27
 questions about 
Gender
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Beauty
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Culture
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
218
 questions about 
Education
51
 questions about 
War
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.