Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
117
 questions about 
Children
154
 questions about 
Sex
39
 questions about 
Race
96
 questions about 
Time
284
 questions about 
Mind
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception
105
 questions about 
Art
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
51
 questions about 
War
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Biology
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Animals
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.