Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

36
 questions about 
Literature
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
24
 questions about 
Suicide
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
134
 questions about 
Love
23
 questions about 
History
284
 questions about 
Mind
81
 questions about 
Identity
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
51
 questions about 
War
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
31
 questions about 
Space
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
244
 questions about 
Justice
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.