Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
27
 questions about 
Gender
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
374
 questions about 
Logic
2
 questions about 
Culture
70
 questions about 
Truth
80
 questions about 
Death
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
34
 questions about 
Music
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
81
 questions about 
Identity
154
 questions about 
Sex
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
4
 questions about 
Economics
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.