Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
32
 questions about 
Sport
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
117
 questions about 
Children
23
 questions about 
History
124
 questions about 
Profession
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
284
 questions about 
Mind
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Biology
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.