Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

88
 questions about 
Physics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
284
 questions about 
Mind
54
 questions about 
Medicine
170
 questions about 
Freedom
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
77
 questions about 
Emotion
154
 questions about 
Sex
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
374
 questions about 
Logic
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
287
 questions about 
Language
151
 questions about 
Existence
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
80
 questions about 
Death
58
 questions about 
Abortion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
208
 questions about 
Science
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.