Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
134
 questions about 
Love
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Animals
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
208
 questions about 
Science
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
36
 questions about 
Literature
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Beauty
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
32
 questions about 
Sport
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
34
 questions about 
Music
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.