Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
2
 questions about 
Action
36
 questions about 
Literature
51
 questions about 
War
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
89
 questions about 
Law
24
 questions about 
Suicide
170
 questions about 
Freedom
117
 questions about 
Children
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Biology
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
154
 questions about 
Sex
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Culture
287
 questions about 
Language
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.