Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

2
 questions about 
Culture
75
 questions about 
Beauty
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
51
 questions about 
War
1281
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Feminism
4
 questions about 
Economics
374
 questions about 
Logic
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
32
 questions about 
Sport
111
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
117
 questions about 
Children
287
 questions about 
Language
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
208
 questions about 
Science
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
221
 questions about 
Value
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
75
 questions about 
Perception

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.