Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

27
 questions about 
Gender
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
374
 questions about 
Logic
124
 questions about 
Profession
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
105
 questions about 
Art
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business
70
 questions about 
Truth
134
 questions about 
Love
34
 questions about 
Music
77
 questions about 
Emotion
36
 questions about 
Literature
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
96
 questions about 
Time
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
2
 questions about 
Action
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
287
 questions about 
Language
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
23
 questions about 
History
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.