Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Biology
34
 questions about 
Music
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
54
 questions about 
Medicine
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
124
 questions about 
Profession
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
287
 questions about 
Language
88
 questions about 
Physics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Beauty
89
 questions about 
Law
110
 questions about 
Animals
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
31
 questions about 
Space
36
 questions about 
Literature
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
58
 questions about 
Punishment
117
 questions about 
Children
105
 questions about 
Art
4
 questions about 
Economics
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

Humans comprise a naturally occurring species, so I would ask, "What purpose could any naturally occurring species serve?" We humans use some naturally occurring species, such as Oncorhynchus nerka (sockeye salmon), as food, but it doesn't follow that the purpose of that species is to be our food. Unless there is a god who created species for this or that purpose, naturally occurring species -- qua species -- have no purposes. Whatever has a purpose must be intentionally given that purpose, and I think that no being exists who could give humanity as a whole a purpose. So I agree with you that humanity as a whole has no purpose. But humans are hardly unique in that way.

Moreover, even if there were a being who created all humans for a purpose, I doubt that any humans (much less all of humanity) would thereby acquire that purpose, as I suggested in my answer to Question 27543. The only way I can see in which humanity as a whole could have a purpose would be if all humans collectively resolved to make some particular thing the purpose of our species, but even then I doubt that our unanimous resolution would do the trick. An organization can require that every member sign on to the purpose of the organization, but a species isn't an organization. No purpose that the existing members of our species might sign on to can bind past or future humans to that purpose, because past and future humans didn't sign on.