Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

392
 questions about 
Religion
70
 questions about 
Truth
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Beauty
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
80
 questions about 
Death
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
34
 questions about 
Music
170
 questions about 
Freedom
88
 questions about 
Physics
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
58
 questions about 
Abortion
51
 questions about 
War
134
 questions about 
Love
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
81
 questions about 
Identity
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
154
 questions about 
Sex
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
68
 questions about 
Happiness

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.