| Question posted on June 13, 2013; 1 response |
| Can paradoxes actually happen?... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on March 29, 2013; 1 response |
| Is the positing of an infinite regress a legitimate explanation in philosophy respectively are infinite regresses logically possible?... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on March 14, 2013; 1 response |
| How does one determine which side in an argument must shoulder the burden of proof?... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on March 7, 2013; 1 response |
| A very common retort when critizising somebody for a reprehensible action (like selling drugs) is that "If I don't do it, somebody else will". Does this kind of bad reasoning fall into any of the classical categories of argument... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on February 14, 2013; 1 response |
| I am confused about how a conditional statement is necessarily true, and not false or unknown, when the antecedent and consequent are both false. According to the truth table, the sentence "If Bill Clinton is Cambodian, then George Bush is... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on February 7, 2013; 1 response |
| I am learning about the principle of noncontradiction ~(p^~p). I can see that this would work if we assume that 'p' can only be true or false. Why should I make this assumption. I can see a... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on January 31, 2013; 2 responses |
| I know affirming the consequent is a fallacy, so that any argument with that pattern is invalid. But what what about analytically true premises, or causal premises? Are these not really instances of the fallacy? They seem to take its... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on January 10, 2013; 1 response |
| How, if at all, is the following paradox resolved?
You hand someone a card.
On one side is printed "The statement on the other side of this card is true."
On the other side is printed, "The statement on the other side of... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on January 2, 2013; 1 response |
| Here's a quote from Hume: "Nothing, that is distinctly conceivable, implies a contradiction." My question is this: what is the difference between something that is logically a contradiction and something that happens to not be instantiated? For example, ghosts do... |
| Existence, Logic |
|
| Question posted on December 20, 2012; 4 responses |
| Is it true that anything can be concluded from a contradiction? Can you explain? It's seems like its a tautology if taken figuratively because we can indeed conclude anything if we suspend the rules of reasoning, but there is nothing... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on December 20, 2012; 2 responses |
| If the sentence "q because p" is true, must the sentence "If p then q" also be true?
For example, "the streets are wet because it is raining," and the sentence "if it is raining, then the streets are wet."
Are there... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on December 13, 2012; 2 responses |
| If the sentence "If p then q" is true, must the sentence "q because p" also be true?
For example, "if it is raining, then the streets are wet" and the sentence "The streets are wet because it is raining."
Are there... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on November 25, 2012; 1 response |
| Is there a term for the logical fallacy that other people have it worse, so you should be happy?
Example: I fall down a staircase, breaking my leg. The next day I go into work, and someone (inevitably) says "Phfeh! That's... |
| Ethics, Logic |
|
| Question posted on November 25, 2012; 1 response |
| Can a valid syllogism be fallacious?
For example
God can speak Mandarin.
Charity is God.
∴ Charity can speak Mandarin.
David can speak Tagalog.
David's bones are David.
∴ David's bones can speak Tagalog.
I'm pretty sure these are valid but unsound syllogisms, and I think they both... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on November 17, 2012; 1 response |
| Why is the socratic paradox called a paradox?... |
| Logic, Philosophers |
|
| Question posted on November 8, 2012; 3 responses |
| Is there a way to prove that logic works? It seems that the only two methods for doing this would be to use a logical proof –which would be incorporating an assumed answer into the question– or to use some... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on November 1, 2012; 1 response |
| Another application of the ad hominem fallacy questions...
Let's say there is an expert who holds a doctorate and masters in their field of specialty. They have worked in their field for 30+ years. They have received grants from government sources,... |
| Logic |
|
| Question posted on November 1, 2012; 1 response |
| Is there a logical explanation for why one ought to be altruistic?
Someone tried to logically prove to me why one ought to be altruistic. I found a list of logical fallacies here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies and I'd like to know which... |
| Ethics, Logic |
|
| Question posted on September 26, 2012; 1 response |
| Would an omnipotent and omniscient being be bound by the laws of logic? If so, to what degree?... |
| Logic, Religion |
|
| Question posted on September 22, 2012; 1 response |
| If Laws of logic are true or hold in all contexts, how can there be more one law? Do the two versions of De Mogan's laws differ? If so. how? Does the law of excluded middle differ from the law... |
| Logic |
|