Add this site to your Home Screen by opening it in Safari, tapping and selecting "Add to home screen"
Our panel of 90 professional philosophers has responded to
- 2 Culture
- 96 Time
- 2 Action
- 165 Freedom
- 23 History
- 79 Identity
- 568 Philosophy
- 32 Sport
- 146 Existence
- 74 Perception
- 86 Physics
- 131 Love
- 241 Justice
- 43 Color
- 53 Medicine
- 1259 Ethics
- 74 Beauty
- 24 Suicide
- 206 Science
- 66 Truth
- 79 Death
- 115 Children
- 123 Profession
- 281 Language
- 38 Race
- 68 Happiness
- 109 Biology
- 385 Religion
- 58 Punishment
- 215 Education
- 217 Value
- 69 Business
- 77 Emotion
- 5 Euthanasia
- 87 Law
- 4 Economics
- 280 Mind
- 36 Literature
- 27 Gender
- 50 War
- 31 Space
- 275 Knowledge
- 107 Animals
- 58 Abortion
- 34 Music
- 358 Logic
- 67 Feminism
- 153 Sex
- 104 Art
If by "laws of thoughts" you mean laws of logic, then no.
No coherent (that is, self-consistent) situation can violate any law of logic. Even philosophers, such as Graham Priest, who claim to be able to imagine situations that violate the law of non-contradiction concede that those situations are not self-consistent.