Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Punishment
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
105
 questions about 
Art
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
58
 questions about 
Abortion
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
88
 questions about 
Physics
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
68
 questions about 
Happiness
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
374
 questions about 
Logic
134
 questions about 
Love
284
 questions about 
Mind
43
 questions about 
Color
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
244
 questions about 
Justice
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
287
 questions about 
Language
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
89
 questions about 
Law
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
392
 questions about 
Religion
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.