Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
77
 questions about 
Emotion
69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
218
 questions about 
Education
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
32
 questions about 
Sport
124
 questions about 
Profession
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
244
 questions about 
Justice
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Perception
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
68
 questions about 
Happiness
58
 questions about 
Abortion
36
 questions about 
Literature
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
27
 questions about 
Gender
105
 questions about 
Art
170
 questions about 
Freedom
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Animals
88
 questions about 
Physics
110
 questions about 
Biology

Question of the Day

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.