Consider the following scenario: an acquaintance I personally do not particularly enjoy talking to is learning French and asks me for a favour, namely to chat with them an hour per week in French, my mother tongue. Would it be morally good to do them the favour, even if it would just be out of duty? Or another scenario: my mum wants me to visit her for Christmas, but I wish not to, just as much as she wants me to go. Should I go out of duty? According to Kant, good actions must be motivated by a sense of duty, as opposed to inclination. But shouldn't it be just the other way round, at least if the action is about doing another person a favour? It almost seems immoral to do somebody a favour only because of duty.

The question reminds me of Schiller's lines. Scruples of Conscience I like to serve my friends, but unfortunately I do it by inclination And so often I am bothered by the thought that I am not virtuous. Decision There is no other way but this! You must seek to despise them And do with repugnance what duty bids you. These lines are often cited as an objection to Kant's account of moral worth; Frederick Beiser challenges the standard reading of these lines in a discussion of the relation between Kant and Schiller in Schiller as Philospher: A Re-Examination . I want also to add a few remarks about Kant to Matthew's perceptive response. First, a point about the examples in the Groundwork . Kant introduces those examples in order to isolate the moral motive, in order to explicate the concept of a good will, which Kant introduces in the first sentence of the body of the Groundwork : "It is impossible to think of...

Pages