Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

77
 questions about 
Emotion
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
39
 questions about 
Race
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Culture
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
208
 questions about 
Science
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Animals
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
89
 questions about 
Law
70
 questions about 
Truth
67
 questions about 
Feminism
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
31
 questions about 
Space
154
 questions about 
Sex
110
 questions about 
Biology
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
105
 questions about 
Art
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.