If one is upset that the places they visit are too populated, such as coffee shops, beaches, museums, etc., is that frustration a sign of hypocrisy? To put it another way, if I resent crowds and wish that people would leave, but I don't leave, am I being a hypocrite?

There is nothing hypocritical about wishing that one was, say, the only person on a beach. On the other hand, if you don't just wish that other people went away, but you think they have an obligation to leave, then you are probably entering the hypocrisy zone.

What is meant by the phrase "owing it to yourself"? How can you "owe" anything to yourself? What "loan" are you repaying when repaying a debt to yourself? Do we, as a matter of fact, ever "owe" anything to ourselves?

I agree that this is a funny expression. It's not as if I can borrow money from myself and then get in debt to myself. Maybe we just use this expression to say something like: 'This is something you can do, it is perhaps not something you would do as a matter of course, but doing it would be good for you'. If that is roughly the meaning (I doubt that this paraphrase is exactly right), then at least it is not suprising that we came up with a short expression for it! The expression also raises what is perhaps a deeper philosophical question, which is whether you can have an obligation to yourself. I'm inclined to say that you can have such an obligation, for example that you have an obligation to yourself not to take dangerous drugs, but the question is difficult and controversial.

Is it possible for a human to ever do a selfless act? When someone does do a seemingly 'selfless' act, it is normally because of religious duties or an excuse to brag about it at a later stage, or even to get that good feeling you get when you know you have done a good deed (which is essentially selfish, considering that you get a mental reward, instead of a material one).

A powerful demon gave me a choice at lunch the other day: either my children will thrive and I will think they are miserable (which will make me feel miserable), or my children will really be miserable but I will think they are thriving (which will make me feel very happy). The moment I choose, I will have no memory of having made a choice or indeed of having ever had lunch with a demon. You know what? I'm going to choose happy children and miserable me. I'm no angel, but that is a selfless act.

If science (i.e. evolutionary psychology) can explain why I have the morality I do, does that mean morality is subjective? If what I believe about morality is just a product of my evolution and my upbringing, can I still expect other people to live up to my principles even though they may have had a different upbringing? What about myself? Can I still hold myself to my own standards or am I being deceived by my evolution into thinking it would be wrong to do so?

It is hard to say what makes a moral judgment correct, but the fact that a belief in a certain area has a innate basis, perhaps molded by evolutionary forces, does not entail that the belief is subjective. Thus it might be that I have an innate belief that certain animals are dangerous, and that this belief is objectively correct. Moreover I might go on to acquire excellent empirical reasons for this belief (if I survive the data).

Pages