Why do most philosophers assume that there is one manner of justifying ethics?

Why do most philosophers assume that there is one manner of justifying ethics?

Why do most philosophers assume that there is one manner of justifying ethics? Couldn't it be that some ethical principles or rules can be justified by a consequentialist approach, others by an evolutionary approach, still others by a deontological approach and some are just relative to specific cultures?

Read another response by Douglas Burnham, Allen Stairs
Read another response about Ethics
Print