Since Hume clearly says that even children know truths about the unexamined, why

Since Hume clearly says that even children know truths about the unexamined, why

Since Hume clearly says that even children know truths about the unexamined, why do so many intelligent people take Hume to be skeptical of, as opposed to curious about the logic of (justified), inductive practice? I mean, he says, "as a philosopher who has some share of curiosity, I will not say skepticism. I want to learn the foundation of this [inductive] inference." So what's the deal?

Read another response by Peter Lipton, Sean Greenberg
Read another response about Philosophers
Print