As I understand it, inductive reasoning is considered by most a posteriori; yet

As I understand it, inductive reasoning is considered by most a posteriori; yet

As I understand it, inductive reasoning is considered by most a posteriori; yet I had learned about induction in a statistics class similar to the way someone would understand a clearly a priori mathematical theory. Assuming one would consider some conclusions based on induction, is it a priori or a posterori? John

Read another response by Thomas Pogge
Read another response about Probability
Print