Are the concepts of 'panta rhei' (Heraclitus' river analogy) and hard

Are the concepts of 'panta rhei' (Heraclitus' river analogy) and hard

Are the concepts of 'panta rhei' (Heraclitus' river analogy) and hard determinism reconcilable, or are they mutually exclusive? One suggests a world constantly in flux and the other a world where all events are determined rigidly by prior ones. But surely even if 'everything changes', it is possible for all of those changes to be determined? Or am I interpreting Heraclitus wrongly?

Read another response by Nickolas Pappas
Read another response about Philosophers
Print