My brother (a philosopher) and I have been having a discussion regarding

My brother (a philosopher) and I have been having a discussion regarding

My brother (a philosopher) and I have been having a discussion regarding empirical reasoning. A sticking point arose when my brother stated that the conclusion of empirical reasoning must be correct if the premises are taken as correct. I maintain that the conclusion will be correct to varying degrees if the empiric observations are several, and that the degree of correctness may change as more observations are added over time. Can you offer any insight to this argument?

Read another response by Alexander George
Read another response about Logic
Print