Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

96
 questions about 
Time
51
 questions about 
War
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
105
 questions about 
Art
244
 questions about 
Justice
75
 questions about 
Perception
284
 questions about 
Mind
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
81
 questions about 
Identity
31
 questions about 
Space
69
 questions about 
Business
134
 questions about 
Love
89
 questions about 
Law
58
 questions about 
Punishment
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
34
 questions about 
Music
392
 questions about 
Religion
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
208
 questions about 
Science
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Culture
218
 questions about 
Education
110
 questions about 
Biology
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
170
 questions about 
Freedom
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex
43
 questions about 
Color
68
 questions about 
Happiness
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.