Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
244
 questions about 
Justice
81
 questions about 
Identity
124
 questions about 
Profession
170
 questions about 
Freedom
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
70
 questions about 
Truth
4
 questions about 
Economics
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Perception
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
105
 questions about 
Art
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
89
 questions about 
Law
392
 questions about 
Religion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
77
 questions about 
Emotion
208
 questions about 
Science
32
 questions about 
Sport
2
 questions about 
Action
68
 questions about 
Happiness
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
58
 questions about 
Abortion
96
 questions about 
Time
134
 questions about 
Love
31
 questions about 
Space
374
 questions about 
Logic
117
 questions about 
Children
284
 questions about 
Mind

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.