Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
81
 questions about 
Identity
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
221
 questions about 
Value
75
 questions about 
Beauty
70
 questions about 
Truth
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Biology
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
208
 questions about 
Science
32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
58
 questions about 
Abortion
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
392
 questions about 
Religion
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
31
 questions about 
Space
43
 questions about 
Color
34
 questions about 
Music
151
 questions about 
Existence
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
287
 questions about 
Language
77
 questions about 
Emotion
24
 questions about 
Suicide

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.