Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

39
 questions about 
Race
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
4
 questions about 
Economics
110
 questions about 
Biology
32
 questions about 
Sport
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
67
 questions about 
Feminism
134
 questions about 
Love
51
 questions about 
War
218
 questions about 
Education
244
 questions about 
Justice
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
96
 questions about 
Time
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
154
 questions about 
Sex
31
 questions about 
Space
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
69
 questions about 
Business
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
36
 questions about 
Literature
117
 questions about 
Children
68
 questions about 
Happiness
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
88
 questions about 
Physics
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
124
 questions about 
Profession
89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Abortion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.