Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
170
 questions about 
Freedom
70
 questions about 
Truth
68
 questions about 
Happiness
81
 questions about 
Identity
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
51
 questions about 
War
105
 questions about 
Art
2
 questions about 
Action
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
218
 questions about 
Education
34
 questions about 
Music
4
 questions about 
Economics
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Biology
67
 questions about 
Feminism
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
88
 questions about 
Physics
134
 questions about 
Love
287
 questions about 
Language
96
 questions about 
Time
31
 questions about 
Space
110
 questions about 
Animals
43
 questions about 
Color
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
27
 questions about 
Gender
89
 questions about 
Law
124
 questions about 
Profession
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
208
 questions about 
Science
75
 questions about 
Perception
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
244
 questions about 
Justice
2
 questions about 
Culture
39
 questions about 
Race

ask a question

recent responses

all topics

info

⚲

Question of the Day

Hello! I'd like to ask about syllogisms. I have a particular problem when understanding this certain syllogism: Some girls are single. Some girls are sad. Therefore, some girls are single and sad. While I think it is valid, I cannot fully make an accurate explanation as to why it is. Hoping somebody could help me. Thanks!

The syllogism in question is not valid. Nothing logically guarantees that the set of single girls and the set of sad girls overlap. Even if both sets have members, it does not follow that they have any members in common. Compare: Some polygons are squares. Some polygons are triangles. But it is false that some polygons are square triangles.