Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

69
 questions about 
Business
39
 questions about 
Race
67
 questions about 
Feminism
151
 questions about 
Existence
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
117
 questions about 
Children
221
 questions about 
Value
2
 questions about 
Action
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
110
 questions about 
Biology
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Punishment
392
 questions about 
Religion
32
 questions about 
Sport
27
 questions about 
Gender
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
218
 questions about 
Education
244
 questions about 
Justice
68
 questions about 
Happiness
208
 questions about 
Science
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Perception
2
 questions about 
Culture
23
 questions about 
History
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
89
 questions about 
Law
81
 questions about 
Identity
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
96
 questions about 
Time
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
124
 questions about 
Profession
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
43
 questions about 
Color
54
 questions about 
Medicine
154
 questions about 
Sex
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
24
 questions about 
Suicide
77
 questions about 
Emotion

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.