Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
51
 questions about 
War
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
287
 questions about 
Language
67
 questions about 
Feminism
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
36
 questions about 
Literature
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
2
 questions about 
Culture
69
 questions about 
Business
43
 questions about 
Color
27
 questions about 
Gender
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
151
 questions about 
Existence
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
117
 questions about 
Children
4
 questions about 
Economics
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
154
 questions about 
Sex
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Punishment
284
 questions about 
Mind
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
392
 questions about 
Religion
58
 questions about 
Abortion
75
 questions about 
Perception
34
 questions about 
Music
208
 questions about 
Science
89
 questions about 
Law
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
70
 questions about 
Truth

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.