Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

68
 questions about 
Happiness
4
 questions about 
Economics
27
 questions about 
Gender
374
 questions about 
Logic
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
75
 questions about 
Perception
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
124
 questions about 
Profession
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
96
 questions about 
Time
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
110
 questions about 
Animals
34
 questions about 
Music
36
 questions about 
Literature
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
170
 questions about 
Freedom
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
24
 questions about 
Suicide
151
 questions about 
Existence
51
 questions about 
War
287
 questions about 
Language
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
31
 questions about 
Space
221
 questions about 
Value
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
117
 questions about 
Children
58
 questions about 
Abortion
105
 questions about 
Art
58
 questions about 
Punishment
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
43
 questions about 
Color
70
 questions about 
Truth
110
 questions about 
Biology
2
 questions about 
Action
23
 questions about 
History
67
 questions about 
Feminism
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.