Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
39
 questions about 
Race
70
 questions about 
Truth
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception
27
 questions about 
Gender
284
 questions about 
Mind
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Culture
2
 questions about 
Action
105
 questions about 
Art
36
 questions about 
Literature
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
34
 questions about 
Music
23
 questions about 
History
88
 questions about 
Physics
51
 questions about 
War
58
 questions about 
Punishment
374
 questions about 
Logic
96
 questions about 
Time
110
 questions about 
Biology
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
221
 questions about 
Value
43
 questions about 
Color
287
 questions about 
Language
124
 questions about 
Profession
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
54
 questions about 
Medicine
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
67
 questions about 
Feminism
80
 questions about 
Death
170
 questions about 
Freedom
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
69
 questions about 
Business

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.