Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Beauty
221
 questions about 
Value
151
 questions about 
Existence
68
 questions about 
Happiness
32
 questions about 
Sport
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
154
 questions about 
Sex
392
 questions about 
Religion
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
70
 questions about 
Truth
4
 questions about 
Economics
218
 questions about 
Education
67
 questions about 
Feminism
2
 questions about 
Culture
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
96
 questions about 
Time
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
39
 questions about 
Race
244
 questions about 
Justice
287
 questions about 
Language
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
208
 questions about 
Science
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
80
 questions about 
Death
2
 questions about 
Action
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Animals
81
 questions about 
Identity
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
36
 questions about 
Literature
58
 questions about 
Abortion
170
 questions about 
Freedom
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
27
 questions about 
Gender
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
124
 questions about 
Profession

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.