Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

32
 questions about 
Sport
58
 questions about 
Abortion
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
110
 questions about 
Animals
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
34
 questions about 
Music
2
 questions about 
Action
221
 questions about 
Value
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
151
 questions about 
Existence
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Biology
392
 questions about 
Religion
51
 questions about 
War
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
23
 questions about 
History
170
 questions about 
Freedom
81
 questions about 
Identity
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Culture
39
 questions about 
Race
134
 questions about 
Love
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
284
 questions about 
Mind
31
 questions about 
Space
24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
67
 questions about 
Feminism

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.