Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
110
 questions about 
Animals
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
58
 questions about 
Abortion
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
32
 questions about 
Sport
110
 questions about 
Biology
70
 questions about 
Truth
43
 questions about 
Color
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
170
 questions about 
Freedom
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language
218
 questions about 
Education
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
54
 questions about 
Medicine
77
 questions about 
Emotion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
134
 questions about 
Love
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
23
 questions about 
History
34
 questions about 
Music
80
 questions about 
Death
31
 questions about 
Space
151
 questions about 
Existence
24
 questions about 
Suicide
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Culture
4
 questions about 
Economics
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.