Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

34
 questions about 
Music
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
4
 questions about 
Economics
244
 questions about 
Justice
218
 questions about 
Education
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
58
 questions about 
Abortion
88
 questions about 
Physics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
39
 questions about 
Race
105
 questions about 
Art
89
 questions about 
Law
374
 questions about 
Logic
32
 questions about 
Sport
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
154
 questions about 
Sex
134
 questions about 
Love
36
 questions about 
Literature
75
 questions about 
Beauty
151
 questions about 
Existence
43
 questions about 
Color
75
 questions about 
Perception
117
 questions about 
Children
81
 questions about 
Identity
70
 questions about 
Truth
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Action
24
 questions about 
Suicide
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
392
 questions about 
Religion
208
 questions about 
Science
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
80
 questions about 
Death
27
 questions about 
Gender
58
 questions about 
Punishment
23
 questions about 
History
54
 questions about 
Medicine
68
 questions about 
Happiness
2
 questions about 
Culture
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.