Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

154
 questions about 
Sex
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
218
 questions about 
Education
244
 questions about 
Justice
110
 questions about 
Biology
88
 questions about 
Physics
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
34
 questions about 
Music
134
 questions about 
Love
208
 questions about 
Science
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Abortion
81
 questions about 
Identity
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
80
 questions about 
Death
75
 questions about 
Beauty
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
36
 questions about 
Literature
68
 questions about 
Happiness
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
392
 questions about 
Religion
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
75
 questions about 
Perception
170
 questions about 
Freedom
96
 questions about 
Time
54
 questions about 
Medicine
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
89
 questions about 
Law
2
 questions about 
Action
70
 questions about 
Truth
24
 questions about 
Suicide
58
 questions about 
Punishment
67
 questions about 
Feminism
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
77
 questions about 
Emotion
221
 questions about 
Value

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.