Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
39
 questions about 
Race
69
 questions about 
Business
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
24
 questions about 
Suicide
27
 questions about 
Gender
68
 questions about 
Happiness
151
 questions about 
Existence
36
 questions about 
Literature
284
 questions about 
Mind
170
 questions about 
Freedom
77
 questions about 
Emotion
75
 questions about 
Beauty
208
 questions about 
Science
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
154
 questions about 
Sex
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
32
 questions about 
Sport
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
244
 questions about 
Justice
117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
96
 questions about 
Time
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
392
 questions about 
Religion
80
 questions about 
Death
4
 questions about 
Economics
105
 questions about 
Art
124
 questions about 
Profession
70
 questions about 
Truth
374
 questions about 
Logic
58
 questions about 
Punishment
31
 questions about 
Space
2
 questions about 
Action
75
 questions about 
Perception
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Biology
88
 questions about 
Physics
221
 questions about 
Value
287
 questions about 
Language

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.