Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

105
 questions about 
Art
88
 questions about 
Physics
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
81
 questions about 
Identity
134
 questions about 
Love
75
 questions about 
Perception
110
 questions about 
Animals
27
 questions about 
Gender
4
 questions about 
Economics
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
67
 questions about 
Feminism
208
 questions about 
Science
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
218
 questions about 
Education
58
 questions about 
Abortion
392
 questions about 
Religion
154
 questions about 
Sex
2
 questions about 
Culture
89
 questions about 
Law
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
75
 questions about 
Beauty
69
 questions about 
Business
151
 questions about 
Existence
70
 questions about 
Truth
287
 questions about 
Language
34
 questions about 
Music
23
 questions about 
History
110
 questions about 
Biology
68
 questions about 
Happiness
24
 questions about 
Suicide
2
 questions about 
Action
96
 questions about 
Time
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
43
 questions about 
Color
124
 questions about 
Profession
244
 questions about 
Justice
32
 questions about 
Sport
117
 questions about 
Children
80
 questions about 
Death
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.