Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
34
 questions about 
Music
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
110
 questions about 
Biology
31
 questions about 
Space
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
134
 questions about 
Love
88
 questions about 
Physics
58
 questions about 
Punishment
208
 questions about 
Science
39
 questions about 
Race
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
69
 questions about 
Business
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
287
 questions about 
Language
27
 questions about 
Gender
117
 questions about 
Children
96
 questions about 
Time
24
 questions about 
Suicide
105
 questions about 
Art
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
110
 questions about 
Animals
218
 questions about 
Education
54
 questions about 
Medicine
23
 questions about 
History
77
 questions about 
Emotion
2
 questions about 
Culture
151
 questions about 
Existence
244
 questions about 
Justice
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
124
 questions about 
Profession
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.