Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

170
 questions about 
Freedom
208
 questions about 
Science
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
24
 questions about 
Suicide
32
 questions about 
Sport
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
124
 questions about 
Profession
54
 questions about 
Medicine
36
 questions about 
Literature
151
 questions about 
Existence
80
 questions about 
Death
287
 questions about 
Language
392
 questions about 
Religion
67
 questions about 
Feminism
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
58
 questions about 
Abortion
2
 questions about 
Action
284
 questions about 
Mind
70
 questions about 
Truth
75
 questions about 
Perception
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
117
 questions about 
Children
34
 questions about 
Music
88
 questions about 
Physics
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
51
 questions about 
War
81
 questions about 
Identity
218
 questions about 
Education
69
 questions about 
Business
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
4
 questions about 
Economics
68
 questions about 
Happiness
374
 questions about 
Logic
23
 questions about 
History
221
 questions about 
Value
110
 questions about 
Animals
89
 questions about 
Law
134
 questions about 
Love
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
27
 questions about 
Gender
2
 questions about 
Culture
110
 questions about 
Biology
105
 questions about 
Art

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.