Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

89
 questions about 
Law
287
 questions about 
Language
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
32
 questions about 
Sport
244
 questions about 
Justice
23
 questions about 
History
24
 questions about 
Suicide
218
 questions about 
Education
392
 questions about 
Religion
68
 questions about 
Happiness
170
 questions about 
Freedom
75
 questions about 
Beauty
81
 questions about 
Identity
110
 questions about 
Animals
2
 questions about 
Action
151
 questions about 
Existence
39
 questions about 
Race
34
 questions about 
Music
154
 questions about 
Sex
117
 questions about 
Children
75
 questions about 
Perception
134
 questions about 
Love
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Abortion
77
 questions about 
Emotion
110
 questions about 
Biology
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Culture
105
 questions about 
Art
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
80
 questions about 
Death
43
 questions about 
Color
51
 questions about 
War
54
 questions about 
Medicine
69
 questions about 
Business
88
 questions about 
Physics
374
 questions about 
Logic
4
 questions about 
Economics
221
 questions about 
Value
96
 questions about 
Time
58
 questions about 
Punishment
70
 questions about 
Truth
36
 questions about 
Literature

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.