Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

24
 questions about 
Suicide
75
 questions about 
Beauty
67
 questions about 
Feminism
77
 questions about 
Emotion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
124
 questions about 
Profession
34
 questions about 
Music
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
110
 questions about 
Animals
39
 questions about 
Race
54
 questions about 
Medicine
75
 questions about 
Perception
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
244
 questions about 
Justice
96
 questions about 
Time
151
 questions about 
Existence
221
 questions about 
Value
154
 questions about 
Sex
4
 questions about 
Economics
117
 questions about 
Children
110
 questions about 
Biology
89
 questions about 
Law
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
208
 questions about 
Science
80
 questions about 
Death
81
 questions about 
Identity
69
 questions about 
Business
68
 questions about 
Happiness
36
 questions about 
Literature
2
 questions about 
Action
287
 questions about 
Language
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
27
 questions about 
Gender
374
 questions about 
Logic
284
 questions about 
Mind
88
 questions about 
Physics
2
 questions about 
Culture
392
 questions about 
Religion
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
43
 questions about 
Color
31
 questions about 
Space
23
 questions about 
History
105
 questions about 
Art
218
 questions about 
Education
134
 questions about 
Love
32
 questions about 
Sport

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.