Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

117
 questions about 
Children
2
 questions about 
Culture
24
 questions about 
Suicide
31
 questions about 
Space
75
 questions about 
Beauty
124
 questions about 
Profession
287
 questions about 
Language
110
 questions about 
Animals
54
 questions about 
Medicine
392
 questions about 
Religion
151
 questions about 
Existence
89
 questions about 
Law
154
 questions about 
Sex
284
 questions about 
Mind
2
 questions about 
Action
77
 questions about 
Emotion
96
 questions about 
Time
218
 questions about 
Education
70
 questions about 
Truth
51
 questions about 
War
27
 questions about 
Gender
208
 questions about 
Science
4
 questions about 
Economics
58
 questions about 
Abortion
43
 questions about 
Color
81
 questions about 
Identity
374
 questions about 
Logic
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
23
 questions about 
History
134
 questions about 
Love
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Perception
36
 questions about 
Literature
67
 questions about 
Feminism
58
 questions about 
Punishment
32
 questions about 
Sport
221
 questions about 
Value
170
 questions about 
Freedom
34
 questions about 
Music
68
 questions about 
Happiness
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
244
 questions about 
Justice
39
 questions about 
Race
110
 questions about 
Biology
80
 questions about 
Death
105
 questions about 
Art
69
 questions about 
Business
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
88
 questions about 
Physics

Question of the Day

If you're asking whether there's a tension between what they say and the message implicit in what they wear, the answer, of course, is yes. If you're asking how I would actually respond, that's partly a question of social judgment. If it seemed appropriate in the circumstances, I would probably ask them about this very point: if eating animals is wrong, how can wearing their hides be right? Perhaps they'd have an answer that managed to thread the needle. If so, I'd be interested to hear it.