Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

110
 questions about 
Animals
24
 questions about 
Suicide
284
 questions about 
Mind
208
 questions about 
Science
54
 questions about 
Medicine
105
 questions about 
Art
77
 questions about 
Emotion
287
 questions about 
Language
51
 questions about 
War
170
 questions about 
Freedom
58
 questions about 
Abortion
58
 questions about 
Punishment
75
 questions about 
Beauty
32
 questions about 
Sport
392
 questions about 
Religion
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
31
 questions about 
Space
124
 questions about 
Profession
27
 questions about 
Gender
70
 questions about 
Truth
117
 questions about 
Children
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
88
 questions about 
Physics
81
 questions about 
Identity
23
 questions about 
History
43
 questions about 
Color
151
 questions about 
Existence
4
 questions about 
Economics
134
 questions about 
Love
221
 questions about 
Value
69
 questions about 
Business
80
 questions about 
Death
67
 questions about 
Feminism
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
110
 questions about 
Biology
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
218
 questions about 
Education
244
 questions about 
Justice
154
 questions about 
Sex
96
 questions about 
Time
2
 questions about 
Action
89
 questions about 
Law
68
 questions about 
Happiness
75
 questions about 
Perception
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Culture
34
 questions about 
Music

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.