Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

43
 questions about 
Color
2
 questions about 
Action
117
 questions about 
Children
69
 questions about 
Business
67
 questions about 
Feminism
75
 questions about 
Perception
32
 questions about 
Sport
81
 questions about 
Identity
208
 questions about 
Science
110
 questions about 
Animals
36
 questions about 
Literature
374
 questions about 
Logic
68
 questions about 
Happiness
34
 questions about 
Music
58
 questions about 
Punishment
392
 questions about 
Religion
218
 questions about 
Education
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
24
 questions about 
Suicide
96
 questions about 
Time
23
 questions about 
History
75
 questions about 
Beauty
77
 questions about 
Emotion
54
 questions about 
Medicine
134
 questions about 
Love
39
 questions about 
Race
31
 questions about 
Space
170
 questions about 
Freedom
110
 questions about 
Biology
51
 questions about 
War
221
 questions about 
Value
244
 questions about 
Justice
89
 questions about 
Law
88
 questions about 
Physics
124
 questions about 
Profession
151
 questions about 
Existence
58
 questions about 
Abortion
284
 questions about 
Mind
4
 questions about 
Economics
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
80
 questions about 
Death
70
 questions about 
Truth
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
105
 questions about 
Art
27
 questions about 
Gender
287
 questions about 
Language
2
 questions about 
Culture
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
154
 questions about 
Sex

Question of the Day

There is a finite number of arrangements of letters; thus there is a finite number of definitions.

Is that true if we're allowed to use each letter an increasing number of times? If our stock of letter tokens increases without limit, then can't the number (and length) of our definitions also increase without limit? Certainly the names of the numbers will tend to get longer as the numbers they name increase, and those names will reuse letters to an ever-increasing degree.