Our panel of 91 professional philosophers has responded to

218
 questions about 
Education
75
 questions about 
Perception
70
 questions about 
Truth
2
 questions about 
Culture
77
 questions about 
Emotion
374
 questions about 
Logic
154
 questions about 
Sex
124
 questions about 
Profession
69
 questions about 
Business
110
 questions about 
Animals
68
 questions about 
Happiness
392
 questions about 
Religion
34
 questions about 
Music
67
 questions about 
Feminism
4
 questions about 
Economics
51
 questions about 
War
88
 questions about 
Physics
36
 questions about 
Literature
27
 questions about 
Gender
117
 questions about 
Children
574
 questions about 
Philosophy
244
 questions about 
Justice
54
 questions about 
Medicine
221
 questions about 
Value
80
 questions about 
Death
134
 questions about 
Love
151
 questions about 
Existence
81
 questions about 
Identity
282
 questions about 
Knowledge
170
 questions about 
Freedom
1280
 questions about 
Ethics
75
 questions about 
Beauty
43
 questions about 
Color
284
 questions about 
Mind
39
 questions about 
Race
2
 questions about 
Action
287
 questions about 
Language
58
 questions about 
Punishment
110
 questions about 
Biology
23
 questions about 
History
58
 questions about 
Abortion
31
 questions about 
Space
105
 questions about 
Art
32
 questions about 
Sport
5
 questions about 
Euthanasia
24
 questions about 
Suicide
89
 questions about 
Law
208
 questions about 
Science
96
 questions about 
Time

Question of the Day

In this context, it sounds as though "qua" is being used to mean "considered as." So, for example, qua sentient being (i.e., considered as a sentient being) you have particular rights, while qua adult citizen (i.e., considered as an adult citizen) you have those rights plus additional rights, such as the right to vote. I see no contradiction here.